| 000 | 02753nam a2200301 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CSPC | ||
| 005 | 20250326104723.0 | ||
| 008 | 240417b2023 ph a ab 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_cCSPC _aCSPC _beng _erda |
||
| 090 | _aUTH ABELS Ar691d 2023 | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aArrabe, John Carlo O., _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDiscourse markers in Bikol-Iriga : _bA grammar sketch / _cJohn Carlo O. Arrabe, Armella P. Mora, and Shaniah DG. Soriano |
| 300 | _a111 leaves. | ||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 502 |
_aUndergraduate Theses (ABELS) - English Language Studies. _cCamarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges, 2023. |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis research focused on discovering and analysing the Bikol-Iriga dialect particularly Discourse Markers along with its types and functions. The main objective is to identify and uncover Bikol-Iriga dialect's different types and functions of discourse markers supported with Fung & Carter's Macro level of Discourse Particles. The researchers utilized a qualitative research design through the responses of the native Irigueños. Transcribed responses were used and analyzed using descriptive content analysis. Furthermore, the researchers used AntConc as an appropriate tool in obtaining the frequency and the percentage of the gathered DMs. Glossing of example sentences were applied in this study. Upon the interview, it was determined that there are DMs present in the dialect under the four (4) types of discourse markers structural, referential, cognitive, and interpersonal. Structural discourse markers consist of su, puon, ya, ay, and kadto/kadtong particles. Referential discourse marker consists of kuwa/kuwan, dawa, kin, kinding, ta, and saka. While in the cognitive discourse markers; gayud, bagana/bana, baga, biyo, man/uman, baya, nganako, and ngani. Lastly, the interpersonal discourse markers consists hay naku, inayko, and ngaya. The researchers made a grammar guide in Bikol-Iriga titled "Grammar Guide: Bikol-Iriga", presenting the grammatical categories and uniqueness of the dialect. The researchers recommend that liguists from Bikol-Iriga continue to unfold the uniqueness of the dialect and proposed that language documentation should continue as it is an essential tool for communication. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aMora, Armella P., _eauthor |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSoriano, Shaniah DG., _eauthor |
|
| 720 | 1 |
_aMartinez-Malaya, Janessa Angustia, _eadviser |
|
| 720 | 1 |
_aFajardo, Dan Fereth B., _epanelist, chair |
|
| 720 | 1 |
_aPontillas, Marlon S., _epanelist |
|
| 720 | 1 |
_aNachor, Herbert John N., _epanelist |
|
| 942 |
_2ddc _cUM _n0 _hABELS _iAr691d _kUTH _m2023 |
||
| 999 |
_c27476 _d27476 |
||